
Other feedback given included negative feedback. One thing mentioned a lot was the fact that there are too many gaps on the front cover. I agree with this criticism, as the front cover does look bare compared to a real music magazine. When constructing the front cover I think I was trying to show case the photo by not having a lot on the front cover. The background also made it hard to put text over it and to change the colour because of the colour in the background. One person suggested that I should of used a more interesting type face and this would make them less interested in the magazine as it looks plain. Another person suggested using something eye catching this would be something like a splash or a flash. Someone else suggested that on my contents I should include more information on the contents of each sub-heading about what each feature includes. Overall, people said the same negative things about the magazine. I asked each person who filled in a questionnaire if they would by this magazine all of them said yes, I then asked them how often and two said monthly, two said weekly, two would subscribe, two said every fortnight, and two said every two months. This is shown in the graph below.

I think I have made this magazine a little bit too expensive for my age range at £3.00, as the majority of the people who filled in my questionnaire said they would pay £2.00 or £2.50 for it. However, some people said they would pay £3.00 for it but these where the people who said they would buy it monthly, whereas the people who said £2.00 where the people who would either buy it weekly or fortnightly or only every two months. This suggests that either the people who would pay weekly for it wouldn't be prepared to pay £3.00 a week but would at £2.00, or that the people who said they would buy it every fortnight or every two months don't buy music magazines very often and when they do they are only prepared to pay £2.00 for them.
No comments:
Post a Comment